Looking at a Random Card: Tireless Missionaries

(What am I doing here? Read here!)

Tireless Missionaries: Okay. I do not know the exact creature/non-creature ratio among all Magic cards. I realize that 20 cards is quite a small sample. And I won’t bother to do the math needed for a chi-square test. But 90% creatures convinces me that I need to give Gatherer an infraction for insufficient randomization! While variance happens, of course, we’ve reached a point where it is more reasonable to assume that the random card feature simply doesn’t work correctly. I have no idea why that would happen, if it was unintentional, and not even a theory really making sense to me why this should be intentional, but here we are. I will think about how to adjust my card selection in the future before I write my next entry.

The card itself is a lot less interesting. Yes, the more or less expensive, defensive creature which gives you back some of your life lost while waiting to cast it has a place in limited. However, I consider this execution to be a failure: For one thing, it is pathetically weak – it’s not as if Staunch Defenders had ever been a bane in limited environments. Then, it is too expensive for a defensive creature for my taste (that’s why I don’t use Staunch Defenders either): A 5-mana creature should push the game towards its conclusion, not just grind it to a halt. It’s fine if an expensive card plays a role in both offense and defense, like Angel of Mercy or Shepherd of the Lost, but the Missionaries are far away from being able to do that. I’m generally wary of loading an environment with too many defensive creatures – they lead to ground stalls, which in turn lead to too many games being decided by a good topdeck. A Teroh’s Faithful here and a Wall of Swords there can help drafters diversify their strategies, enabling slower, controllish decks, but if too many creatures feature higher toughness than power (or have defender), deckbuilding degenerates into looking for a way to integrate as many power cards as possible (in other words, it plays like the typical sealed environment).

Thus, the Missionaries are useless to me for three reasons: 1) There are numerous better alternatives available. 2) Even if there weren’t, the Missionaries would still be too weak. 3) Even if they were stronger, I wouldn’t want them in the 5-mana-slot.

If they happen to be included in a limited environment, they of course won’t ruin it (at least not by themselves), and might under specific circumstances even prove marginally useful. They also have a relevant and fitting creature type (I mean cleric, not human). Therefore – and noting that they are, of course, useless in constructed, and that their flavor is okay, but not really convincing – they do a little better than an E, earning an E+.

To the index of all cards reviewed by me so far

Explore posts in the same categories: Looking at a random card

Tags: , , , ,

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

6 Comments on “Looking at a Random Card: Tireless Missionaries”


  1. Why don’t you just use the random card feature from magiccards.info?


  2. Well, because when I started this feature, I had no reason to believe that Gatherer’s wouldn’t work correctly! Also, while magiccards.info is useful, there are many mistakes with the cards. and just because I’m not sure I can trust Gatherer here, it doesn’t mean I’m convinced I can trust that site’s random card feature. I prefer to link to the official source anyway. I’ve yet to decide how I will proceed, though.

  3. Seanchui Says:

    When you roll a d6 6 times, and you get 5 times the “6”… then there’s anyway a chance of 16,67% to roll a 6… I think the random card feature works correctly.


    • That is possible. However, if a D6 shows the behaviour you describe, it is more likely that something’s amiss with it,and if you get eleven 6s out of 12 rolls, you can almost be sure of it.

      • Seanchui Says:

        That’s right, but that’s random… btw, I’ve made a test with the random card feature. After 20 clicks i got:

        10 creatures
        10 other cards (incl. 1 land, 1 planeswalker, 2 artifacts…)

        I think it works correctly.


        • As I said, possible. I will do such a test myself. Maybe, for some reason, it doesn’t work correctly just for me (perhaps due to some pre-installed option chosen for me). Maybe it WAS a bug and has been fixed in the meantime.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s